Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EMA Adopts a Negative Opinion for Human IgG1 mAb Specific for Human Interleukin-1 Alpha XBiotech

This medicine was intended to treat debilitating symptoms of advanced colorectal cancer
08 Jun 2017
Gastrointestinal cancers

On 18 May 2017, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a negative opinion, recommending the refusal of the marketing authorisation for human IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for human interleukin-1 alpha XBiotech, intended for treating debilitating symptoms of advanced colorectal cancer.

The company that applied for authorisation is XBiotech Germany GmbH. It may request a re-examination of the opinion within 15 days of receipt of notification of this negative opinion.

It is a medicine containing the active substance human IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for human interleukin-1 alpha. It was to be available as a concentrate to be made up into a solution for infusion.

The medicine was expected to be used for treating debilitating symptoms of advanced colorectal cancer. Such symptoms include cachexia, a form of muscle wasting with significant weight loss.

How does the medicine work?

The active substance is a protein that attaches to and blocks another protein called human interleukin-1 alpha, which is involved in many activities in the body including some that aid the growth and spread of cancer cells. By blocking the actions of human interleukin-1 alpha, the medicine is expected to slow down the growth of the cancer, thus relieving patients’ symptoms.

What did the company present to support its application?

The company presented results of a main study in 333 patients looking at the effects of this medicine on lean body mass (body weight excluding fat) and quality of life. The medicine was compared with placebo.

What were the CHMP’s main concerns that led to the refusal?

The CHMP had a number of concerns. First, the committee noted that the study did not show clear improvements in either lean body mass or quality of life. Secondly, there was an increased risk of infection in patients taking the medicine, which was not considered acceptable in vulnerable patients who will be receiving palliative care. Lastly, there were inadequate controls of the manufacturing process to ensure the medicine would have the same quality as the product used in clinical trials.

Therefore, the CHMP was of the opinion that the benefits of this medicine did not outweigh its risks and recommended that it be refused marketing authorisation.

What consequences does this refusal have for patients in clinical trials or compassionate use programmes?

The company informed the CHMP that it will continue to provide the medicine to all patients currently enrolled in clinical trials or compassionate use programmes. If you are in a clinical trial or compassionate use programme and need more information about your treatment, contact the doctor who is giving it to you.

Update of 23 June 2017:

The company that applied for a marketing authorisation for this medicine has requested a re-examination of the CHMP’s May 2017 opinion. Upon receipt of the grounds of the request, the CHMP will re-examine its opinion and issue a final recommendation.

Last update: 08 Jun 2017

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.