Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EMA Starts Re-examination of Negative Opinion for Glutamine

It was intended for the treatment of sickle cell disease
23 Jul 2019
Haematologic malignancies

On 29 May 2019, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a negative opinion, recommending the refusal of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product glutamine (Xyndari), intended for the treatment of sickle cell disease.

The company that applied for authorisation is Emmaus Medical Europe Limited.

The applicant for Xyndari has requested a re-examination of the Committee's negative opinion for this medicine. The CHMP will now re-examine the opinion and issue a final recommendation.

Xyndari is a medicine that contains the active substance glutamine. It was to be available as a powder to be dissolved in liquid and taken by mouth.

Xyndari was expected to be used to treat sickle cell disease, a genetic disease in which the red blood cells become rigid and crescent-shaped. The abnormal cells block the flow of blood around the body and release haemoglobin into the blood. This leads to pain, organ damage, repeated infections and anaemia.

Xyndari was designated an orphan medicine, a medicine to be used in rare diseases, on 4 July 2012 for sickle cell disease.

Glutamine is an active substance in several nationally authorised medicines used for parenteral nutrition.

The way that glutamine works in sickle cell disease is not well understood. Studies indicate that when taken up by the abnormal red blood cells in sickle cell disease, glutamine should reduce the stickiness of these cells to the walls of blood vessels. This was expected to improve blood flow to the organs, thereby reducing periods of pain, called sickle cell crises, experienced with sickle cell disease.

To support its application, the company presented the results of a main study in 230 patients with sickle cell disease. Patients received either Xyndari or placebo for a year. The main measure of effectiveness was the number of sickle cell crises the patients experienced. The study also looked at how often patients had to go to hospital with pain from sickle cell disease. The company also submitted results of a supportive study using similar measures of effectiveness in 70 patients who received either Xyndari or placebo.

The CHMP considered that the main study did not show that Xyndari was effective at reducing the number of sickle cell crises or hospital visits. A large number of patients, more who were taking Xyndari than taking placebo, dropped out of the study before it was finished, and information on how the medicine worked for those patients was not available. The CHMP considered that the way data from these patients were dealt with was not appropriate.

The CHMP also had concerns about the supportive study, which involved a small number of patients, many of whom also dropped out of the study early. In addition, in this study more of the patients taking Xyndari had received a medicine for sickle cell disease called hydroxyurea than patients taking placebo. This could have influenced the results.

Therefore, the CHMP was of the opinion that the benefits of Xyndari could not be established and recommended that it be refused marketing authorisation.

The company informed the CHMP that there are no ongoing clinical trials with Xyndari in Europe and that the consequences for patients in compassionate use programmes are not known.

Last update: 23 Jul 2019

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings