eUpdate – Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment Recommendations
Published: 26 February 2020. Authors: ESMO Guidelines Committee
Clinical Practice Guidelines
This update refers to the Renal Cell Carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al. Ann Oncol 2019; 30(5): 706–720.
Section
Table 7: ESMO-MCBS table for new therapies/indications in renal cell carcinomaa
The following Table replaces Table 7.
Therapy |
Pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma |
Trial |
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy in participants with renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426) [1] NCT02853331 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Sunitinib PFS 11.1 months 12 months survival 78% |
Absolute survival gain |
PFS gain 4 months 12 months survival gain: 12% |
HR (95% CI) |
PFS HR 0.69 (0.57-0.84) OS HR: 0.53 (0.38-0.74)c significant |
QoL/toxicity |
- |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
4 (Form 2b) |
Therapy |
Nivolumab, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma previously treated with one or two regimens of anti-angiogenic therapy |
Trial |
Study of nivolumab vs. everolimus in pre-treated advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CheckMate 025) [2] NCT01668784 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Everolimus Median OS: 19.6 months |
Absolute survival gain |
OS gain: 5.4 months |
HR (95% CI) |
OS HR: 0.73 (0.57–0.93) |
QoL/toxicity |
Improved toxicity profile (QoL benefit reported in exploratory evaluationd) |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
5 (Form 2a) |
Therapy |
Cabozantinib |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Advanced renal cell carcinoma in adults following prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors |
Trial |
A study of cabozantinib (XL184) vs everolimus in subjects with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (METEOR) [3] NCT01865747 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Everolimus Median OS: 16.5 months |
Absolute survival gain |
OS gain: 4.9 months |
HR (95% CI) |
OS HR: 0.66 (0.53–0.83) |
QoL/toxicity |
- |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
3 (Form 2a) |
Therapy |
Lenvatinib in combination with everolimus |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma following one prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy |
Trial |
A study of E7080 alone, and in combination with everolimus in subjects with unresectable advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma following one prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment [4] NCT01136733 |
Phase |
Phase II |
Control |
Everolimus Median OS: 15.4 months |
Absolute survival gain |
OS gain: 10.1 months |
HR (95% CI) |
OS HR: 0.51 (0.30–0.88) |
QoL/toxicity |
- |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
4e (Form 2a) (secondary endpoint of OS in a small phase II randomised study) |
Therapy |
Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab |
---|---|
Disease setting |
First-line therapy for intermediate- and poor-risk advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
Trial |
Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (CheckMate 214) [5,6,7] NCT02231749 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Sunitinib Median OS: 26.6 months |
Absolute survival gain |
OS gain: 13 monthsf |
HR (95% CI) |
OS HR: 0.66 (0.54– 0.80) |
QoL/toxicity |
QoL benefit reported in exploratory evaluationd |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
4 (Form 2a) |
Therapy |
Tivozanib |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell component, and prior nephrectomy |
Trial |
A study to compare tivozanib (AV-951) to sorafenib in subjects with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TIVO-1) [8] NCT01030783 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Sorafenib Median PFS: 9.1 months |
Absolute survival gain |
PFS gain: 2.8 months |
HR (95% CI) |
PFS HR: 0.80 (0.64–0.99) |
QoL/toxicity |
OS NS No QoL benefit |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
1 (Form 2b) |
Therapy |
Avelumab in combination with axitinib |
---|---|
Disease setting |
Previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma |
Trial |
A study of avelumab with axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Renal 101) [9] Phase III NCT02684006 |
Phase |
Phase III |
Control |
Sunitinib PFS 8.4 months |
Absolute survival gain |
ITT PFS gain 5.4 months |
HR (95% CI) |
ITT PFS HR 0.69 (0.56-0.84) |
QoL/toxicity |
- |
ESMO-MCBS scoreb |
3 (Form 2b) |
aEMA approvals since January 2016.
bESMO-MCBS version 1.1 [10]. The scores have been calculated by the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and validated by the ESMO Guidelines Committee.
cInterim analysis of survival met predefined threshold of P<0.0001 but OS not mature
dNot eligible for QoL adjustment
erandomised phase II trial, no confirmatory phase III data
fCalculated conservative estimate of gain based on PE HR 0.66
CI, confidence interval; EMA, European Medicines Agency; ESMO-MCBS, ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention to treat; NS, not significant; OS, overall survival; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PE, primary efficacy; PFS, progression-free survival; QoL, quality of life.
Section
References
- Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al; KEYNOTE-426 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:1116-1127
- Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1803-1813.
- Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:917-927.
- Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Glen H, et al. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1473-1482.
- Motzer R J, Tannir N M, McDermott D F et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(14):1277-1290.
- Motzer R J, Rini B I, McDermott D F et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019; 20(10):1370-1385.
- Cella D, Grünwald V, Escudier B et al. Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; S1470-2045(18)30778-2.
- Motzer RJ, Nosov D, Eisen T et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3791-3799.
- Motzer, RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J et al; Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:1103-1115.
- Cherny NI, Dafni U, Bogaerts J et al. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 2340–2366.