Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EMA Recommends Refusal of the Marketing Authorisation for Doxolipad

Doxolipad, a hybrid medicine, contains the active substance doxorubicin
13 Sep 2019
Cytotoxic Therapy

On 31 January 2019, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a negative opinion, recommending the refusal of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Doxolipad (doxorubicin), intended for the treatment of breast and ovarian cancer.

The company that applied for authorisation is TLC Biopharmaceuticals B.V. It may request a re-examination of the opinion within 15 days of receipt of notification of this negative opinion.

Doxolipad is a cancer medicine that contains the active substance doxorubicin. It was to be available as a concentrate to be made into a solution for infusion into a vein.

Doxolipad was developed as a hybrid medicine. This means that Doxolipad was intended to be similar to a reference medicine already authorised in the European Union called Adriamycin. The difference between the products is that in Doxolipad the active substance doxorubicin is enclosed in pegylated liposomes (see below for more details)

Doxolipad was expected to be used to treat metastatic breast cancer in patients at risk of heart problems, and cancer of the ovary in women whose previous treatment including a platinum-based cancer medicine has stopped working.

The active substance in Doxolipad, doxorubicin, is a cytotoxic medicine that belongs to the group anthracyclines. It works by interfering with the DNA within cells, preventing them from making more copies of DNA and making proteins. This means that cancer cells cannot divide and they eventually die.

Doxorubicin has been available since the 1960s. In Doxolipad, it is enclosed in pegylated liposomes (tiny fatty spheres that are coated with a chemical called polyethylene glycol). The liposomes reduce the rate at which the active substance is broken down, allowing it to circulate in the blood for longer. They also reduce the medicine’s effects on non-cancer cells, so it is less likely to cause some side effects.

To support its application, the company presented data from the scientific literature, and data from studies conducted in experimental models, including comparisons with another authorised doxorubicin medicine, Caelyx, which contains doxorubicin in pegylated liposomal form. Because Doxolipad was developed as a hybrid medicine, the company also presented the results of a study carried out to investigate whether it is ‘bioequivalent’ to Caelyx. Two medicines are bioequivalent when they produce the same levels of the active substance in the body. Although the reference medicine for Doxolipad is Adriamycin, this could not be used in the bioequivalence study because it contains doxorubicin in a different form (not enclosed in pegylated liposomes). Therefore, Caelyx was used instead.

What were the CHMP’s main concerns that led to the refusal?

The results of the bioequivalence study showed that Doxolipad is comparable to Caelyx in terms of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, but failed to show that the amount of free doxorubicin is the same for the two medicines. Therefore, the CHMP was of the opinion that there was insufficient evidence to show that Doxolipad was bioequivalent to Caelyx, and it was not possible to establish that the benefits of Doxolipad outweigh its risks. On that basis, the CHMP recommended that Doxolipad be refused marketing authorisation.

The company informed the CHMP that there are no ongoing clinical trials with Doxolipad in the EU.

The company requested a re-examination of the EMA’s initial opinion. After considering the grounds for this request, the CHMP re-examined the opinion, and confirmed the refusal of the marketing authorisation on 29 May 2019.

The European Public Assessment Report was last updated on 26 August 2019. 

Last update: 13 Sep 2019

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.